Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Apple staffer loses test iPhone in bar – again

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Police called in for search as 'priceless' prototype iPhone 5 is left in Mexican restaurant in San Francisco, according to report

Have you heard this one before? An Apple employee walks into a bar in California with a top-secret iPhone prototype – and leaves it behind. Apple then scrambles to recover the phone, involving the police in the process after it has been sold by a finder, eventually getting it back under wraps.

It happened in April last year – and now, says CNet, it has happened again with a prototype of the very latest iPhone, expected to be launched within the next few weeks.

But this time Apple does not appear to have got the phone back.

According to the report, the phone was lost while being tested outside the Apple campus in a Mexican restaurant in San Francisco's Mission district, and then sold on Craigslist for $200.

It was initially left in a bar called Cava22, which says it takes "real pride in bringing a live and festive Mexican experience, for all our cleints [sic] to enjoy" including a margarita sweet-and-sour mix, by an Apple employee who appears to have been testing it off Apple's campus. The company carries out external testing by letting selected staff take prototypes to urban and other locations in order to test its behaviour in normal settings, rather than the laboratory conditions of its own headquarters.

But they are not meant to leave them behind. "I guess I'll have to make my drinks a little less strong," the owner, Jose Valle, told CNet.

CNet says that Apple contacted the San Francisco police as soon as the loss was discovered and told them that the phone was "priceless" and that the company wanted its safe return.

It was eventually tracked down via a location-tracking system built into the phone to a single-family home in San Francisco's Bernal Heights area, says CNet. But when police and Apple's investigators visited the house, the occupant denied any knowledge of the phone, and it wasn't recovered despite a search – with the occupant's permission – of the residence.

Apple has not commented on the events, which come as interest in the successor to the iPhone 4 – which has variously been guessed at as being called the iPhone 4G, 4S and iPhone 5 – is growing. With the existing model now comparatively old in smartphone terms, having been released in June 2010, the expectation is the next model will have to bring dramatic improvements in performance to compete with rival handsets from companies such as Samsung, Motorola and HTC using Google's Android operating system.

New versions of the iPhone are expected to use more powerful processors and have a different arrangement of the antenna system in the casing. The external antenna caused a media furore last year after some users complained that reception seemed to drop when their hand completed a contact between two metal components. One source at a carrier company suggested to the Guardian that the problem arose because the prototype phones are principally tested on the Apple campus, in areas with relatively strong mobile signals; the signal drop from the antenna "bridging" was principally seen in areas with weaker reception.

Apple is understood to provide carrier companies with iPhones for testing that are shipped in sealed boxes so that staff cannot see the exterior. The tests are necessary to ensure that the phones comply with network software requirements.

Last year a prototype of the iPhone 4 was left in a beer garden by Robert Powell, an Apple engineer. That eventually made its way to the gadget blog Gizmodo, which published pictures and a video of the device. Apple called in the police, who got a warrant to search the home of Jason Chen, Gizmodo's editor. Early in August, prosecutors in San Mateo filed criminal charges against two men, alleging that they sold the iPhone 4 prototype to Gizmodo. It is illegal under California law to take lost property if you know who the owner is likely to be, punishable by up to a year in prison.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/01/apple-staffer-loses-iphone
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Chatterbox: Thursday

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

The place to talk about games and other things that matter

First day of September. Is that summer over, then?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/gamesblog/2011/sep/01/chatterbox-thursday
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

France to launch Deezer streaming music service in UK

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Country not famed for its musical heritage takes on Spotify and We7 with social, streaming application

They may not have produced a band as big as The Beatles, and may bear some responsibility for the musical output of Claude Francois, but the French are hoping that a little of their savoir faire could help boost the fortunes of the struggling UK music industry.

French music streaming service Deezer announced on Thursday that it will launch in the UK this month, hoping to lure music fans from services such as Spotify and We7. The service is styling itself as a new online record store where fans can come for recommendations and new music tips as well as finding their favourite tunes.

"We're offering the best of both worlds," said Deezer UK managing director Mark Foster. "We offering music fans access to any of the music they like on the device of their choice but we are also giving them to chance to discover new music. Other services are great if you know what you want to listen to – but with Deezer there is a real human element. We're bringing the emotion back into discovering new music."

Listening to Johnny Hallyday would not be compulsory for UK listeners, he assured. "It's an on-demand service – if you don't ask for Johnny Hallyday, you won't get Johnny Hallyday."

The service is already a big player in France with 20m users, compared with Spotify's 10m users across the whole of Europe. It has 1.2m subscribers to its premium service, slightly less than Spotify's 1.6m paying customers and is aiming to post a profit this year.

Deezer users in the UK will be able to listen to a variety of radio "stations" based on different musical genres for free, as well as accessing "smart radios", which create radio stations based on similar music to one chosen artist.

But to listen to recommended songs and full tracks – perhaps from big French names like MC Solaar or electro act Justice – users will have to pay £4.99 per month for unlimited streaming on their computers, with £9.99 per month also giving them full access on mobile phones, with the ability to store tunes to play offline later.

But it is with its editorial slant that Deezer UK hopes to put some clear water between itself and close competitor Spotify. Promising a team that "live and breathe music", once a week the site will give recommendations of new music in 12 different genres.

Users can share favourite tracks and playlists and offer comments on chosen tracks to create a noisy online community, said James Foley, head of editorial. "What's the point of having a celestial jukebox if you don't know what to play on it?," he asked. "You wouldn't go into a record store and want to be served by a robot, you want a human who can share their recommendations. We're aiming for a cross between a digital magazine and a record shop where you can listen to all your favourite music." The site, as well as covering recent mainstream pop releases will also have room for more avant garde tastes, he said.

Experts argue that Deezer's success in France is largely based on a deal with Orange, which bundles Deezer with other products for its mobile and internet customers – making the service feel as if it's free. Its chance of success in the UK will rest on it forging a similar deal with a large internet service provider here, following in the footsteps of Spotify, who recently signed a deal with Virgin, according to independent music analyst Mark Mulligan.

Sources close to the company say they are close to setting up a "similar deal" in the UK and are "finalising licensing agreements with all majors and key independents", but this is unlikely to be as powerful as the French deal due to a lack of a dominant internet service provider in the UK, said Mulligan.

"This is a welcome addition to the UK music industry, but it's not going to transform the market," he said. There was a risk, he added, that as Spotify had already cornered much of the subscription market the launch of Deezer risked fracturing the nascent streaming model.

"It feels like a bit of a European Its-A-Knockout competition at the moment," he said. "You've got plucky We7 flying the flag for the UK, a Viking invasion from Spotify and then a Norman invasion from France. It's like history repeating itself."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/sep/01/deezer-launch-uk-spotify-streaming-music
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Lucky George?

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

The chancellor seems to be doing a vanishing act

Where is George Osborne? The economy is losing altitude and yet the pilot has vanished. His minders say he remains in the cockpit and is in full control. Passengers, already upset by the bumpy ride, are not so sure. Why no appearances on Question Time, Newsnight or Channel 4 news? What is he scared of?

Maybe he will turn out to be the lucky chancellor. Certainly the ONS did him a favour with its change to the accounting rules governing Labour's mobile phone 3G licence sale in 2000.

A decision to add £1bn to the accounts over 21 years has been overturned in favour of booking the whole £21bn bonanza in the first year. That means Osborne's deficit reduction plan (with a 2015 finishing date) will benefit from £6bn that was due to be entered in the accounts in the six years before 2021.

Add an estimated £20bn gain on the purchase of government bonds since the banking crash, which is yet to be included in the accounts, and you have a cut in the deficit worth not much less than the entire tax credit bill for last year (£23bn). Who needs a growing economy when you have paper profits from asset sales?


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/31/viewpoint-george-osborne
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

2109: a life of equality – but no polar bears

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

It is going to take 98 years for there to be pay parity between men and women. But what other predictions can be made for the year 2109?

What kind of world is it that ensures that women are paid the same as men? One very different from our own, it seems. The Chartered Management Institute reckons it will take 98 years for us to reach pay parity – by which time our planet looks set to undergo some radical changes.

Robots should finally be smart enough to liberate us from mundane chores – and space tourism will be old news, as will planetary exploration. Instead we will begin reaching out beyond our solar system to neighbouring stars, using millions of tiny nanoships to scout for suitable planets, and giant solar sails to carry us there. And we will use clean nuclear fusion to meet all our energy needs. At least that's according to futurologist Michio Kaku, whose book Physics of the Future attempts to predict what our world will look like a century from now.

But while this may still all sound somewhat far-fetched (and a tad familiar) we may actually find ourselves hoping he's right, not least because of how crowded our planet will become. For, while it's still possible that our global population level may actually have dropped by 2100, if growth continues at current levels, there is the distinct possibility that a century from now we could be brushing shoulders with 43.6 billion other people. Quite literally in fact because, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, if average temperatures are allowed to rise by 1-4C we could see sea levels rising by as much as six metres, which would create even less space. Along the way extinctions may help free up some land. It's impossible to tell which ones, according to Jean-Christophe Vie of the International Union of the Conservation of Nature's Red List of Endangered Species, but in the firing line are tigers, polar bears and the Javan Rhino, he says.

But it's not all bad news. Advances in medicine should boost mortality rates in countries such as the UK. And for women that's great news, because not only will they get to finally enjoy equal pay but their life expectancy should rise to 90, five years longer than their male counterparts.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/aug/31/equality
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

FSA fines Swift Trade £8m for market abuse of 'layering'

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Online brokerage Swift Trade is appealing against FSA fine

A business controlled by Canadian share trader Peter Beck is to be fined £8m by the Financial Services Authority.

The regulator found that Swift Trade stood at the centre of a global web of equity traders engaged in an elaborate market abuse operation.

The FSA confirmed that it had decided to fine Swift Trade, a now dissolved online brokerage catering for day traders, for "systematically and deliberately" manipulating the share price of listed companies, including FTSE 350 firms, for short moments of time throughout 2007.

The FSA said profits from the manipulations were in excess of £1.75m, though it had not been possible to reach an exact figure. Swift Trade, which has transferred assets to a parent company and was dissolved last December, is appealing against the fine. Since May it has fought to keep the regulator's ruling confidential – a battle that it has now lost.

Should the fine be upheld on appeal, the FSA is expected to then pursue a claim for the money on Swift Trade's parent group. It is only the second time the regulator has sought to make public its decision before the appeal process has been exhausted.

The market abuse involved a trading scam known as "layering". This involves traders entering relatively large orders to buy or to sell shares with the London Stock Exchange without ever intending to follow through on those orders. This gives a false impression of demand for a stock, prompting a move in the price – upwards in the case of an apparent abundance of big buyers; downwards when there appear to be lots of heavy sellers.

The bluff orders were deleted within seconds, but not before a small shift in price had allowed Swift Trade to strike, buying or selling equity derivatives at prices that would not otherwise have been possible.

Suspicious trading patterns were eventually picked up by the LSE and passed on to the FSA for investigation. However, Swift Trade had been able to repeat this type of market abuse operation for so long, in part, because it is said to have had a network of more than 50 customers around the world which in turn engaged more than 3,000 traders.

Simon Morris, of law firm CMS Cameron McKenna, said: "Fining a fringe player an enormous amount for market abuse is sending out another powerful message that sleazy malpractices are not tolerated in the City."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/31/fsa-fines-swift-trade-8m-pounds
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

AT&T's T-Mobile merger: antitrust action, at last | Dan Gillmor

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

The justice department's suit against this takeover is welcome, but a virtual duopoly already exists in the US telecoms market

Antitrust enforcement is back in America, perhaps in a serious way. If so, it's long overdue.

But even though the US justice department is suing to block AT&T's buyout of T-Mobile's US wireless operations, competition in America's telecommunications industry is fading. And there's little on the horizon, technically or politically, to suggest any improvement.

Still, Wednesday's legal action, filed by the department's antitrust division, is welcome. The George W Bush administration was easily the most lax in antitrust enforcement in recent history, and the Obama administration hadn't been significantly more ardent to protect competition. Indeed, the current government had spent three years sleepwalking on the job, including a rubber-stamping of cable-TV giant Comcast's buyout of NBC Universal – despite the obvious anticompetitive nature of that deal.

The government's complaint in this case says what most people – apart from those who stood to gain directly – already knew: The deal would reduce competition in a marketplace that is already an oligopoly. From the lawsuit:

"AT&T's elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low-priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market Thus, unless this acquisition is enjoined, customers of mobile wireless telecommunications services likely will face higher prices, less product variety and innovation, and poorer quality services due to reduced incentives to invest than would exist absent the merger."

The deal could still happen, in one of several ways. The justice department's suit may simply be prelude to a deal in which AT&T makes some concessions, in terms of service or partial spinoffs, that keep the overall deal structure intact while alleviating at least some of the anticompetitive concerns. The act of going to court, however, suggests that either AT&T wasn't interested in dealing or that the government simply found this buyout unacceptable on its face.

Sometimes, companies fight hard to complete deals opposed by antitrust regulators; the justice department and federal trade commission essentially split these duties in America. For example, Oracle beat the department's attempt – one of the very few Bush antitrust initiatives – to block its buyout of PeopleSoft in 2004, winning at trial after a lawsuit that showed fairly persuasively that competition would not be irreparably harmed. (I am attending a huge trade show this week sponsored by Salesforce.com, which has become a formidable competitor since the Oracle-PeopleSoft case.)

AT&T's lobbying efforts on behalf of this deal, and its brazen lack of regard for reality, have been epic. An ineptly redacted document filed with the federal communications commission – an agency that has shown no inclination to protect consumers or competition in the telecoms arena – made abundantly clear (as if it wasn't already) that the primary motive for the buyout was to reduce competition, contrary to countless statements about how this would be great for customers. Sadly, people who should know better endorsed the deal, including a normally sensible trade union, the Communications Workers of America, which liked the idea because AT&T is a union shop and T-Mobile isn't. (The union, locked in a bitter battle with Verizon, might consider that making the company more powerful, evan as it lays off lots of employees, wouldn't necessarily help workers overall.)

Even if AT&T is fully blocked from this purchase, however, there's a larger problem: telecommunications in the US have become a nearly unregulated oligopoly as a whole, and effectively a duopoly or outright monopoly in many local areas. This is true in the wire-line market and, increasingly, the wireless arena. They are enforcing scarcity of service, which is one way they make money.

As law professor and telecoms expert Susan Crawford explains in a must-read analysis, AT&T and Verizon are heading toward dupoly status in any event, in part because T-Mobile and Sprint, the also-rans in the American national wireless market, don't control as much prime spectrum (airwaves) as they need to in order to fully compete – and they aren't likely to get it in the future. Writes Crawford:

"As things stand now, both of these dominant network access wireless providers have the freedom to act as an editor or gatekeeper for its own commercial purposes. They would like their services to be much more like cable programming than general purpose communications – edited and constricted communications offerings. AT&T and Verizon have succeeded in persuading federal regulators that they should not be treated as communications providers, and see the future potential for vertically integrated services that they control and monetise. They have a giant built-in conflict of interest."

The justice department's action doesn't change this in the slightest. And the Obama administration overall has been toothless on promoting competition in one of the 21st century's most vital industries. Data communications aren't going to replace the highways of the past, but they are as vital a transportation link, if not more so, than anything that has come before. Meanwhile, a Congress that is largely owned and operated by corporate interests has been overtly hostile to fostering competition.

What this means should worry, if not terrify, everyone who believes in a telecoms market that operates fairly and neutrally. The telecoms giants have every incentive to reward incumbents, especially themselves and tech/media partners who can pay enough to get priority. They have even more incentive, as a result, to choose who will get to innovate in the future.

If you wanted to strangle progress, this would be a good place to start.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/aug/31/at-t-tmobile-merger-justice-department
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Oracle's Africa dealings come under FBI scrutiny

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Allegations of bribery are understood to centre around software sales to government agencies in Western and Central Africa

US authorities are investigating allegations that executives working for software group Oracle bribed African officials, in violation of anti-bribery laws.

Agents at the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI) and the Justice department have been investigating the claims for at least a year, the Wall Street Journal reported. Top financial watchdog the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is also looking at possible civil violations. The allegations are understood to centre around software sales to government agencies in Western and Central Africa. Law enforcement agencies are investigating whether Oracle or people working for the company made payments to government officials to secure contracts. Oracle did not return calls for comment.

Such payments would violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), which makes it a crime for US companies and their employees to offer or pay bribes to foreign government officials or employees of state-owned companies.

US authorities have been increasingly aggressive in their use of the FCPA, said professor Mike Koehler of Butler University, author of The FCPA Blog. Koehler said FCPA actions had increased with the increasing globalisation of business and stricter requirements for disclosure brought in under 2002's Sarbanes Oxley rules.

"Every week there seem to be more and more companies going through what Oracle is going through," said Koehler. The Justice Department brought 24 enforcement actions in 2010, up from five in 2004, and has brought seven so far this year. Penalties too have increased. In 2009 and 2010 criminal totalled a combined $2bn, up from about $11m in 2004. Koehler calculates that in 2010 FCPA actions accounted for 50% of the fines levied by the Justice department's criminal division.

Koehler said he expected Oracle would fully cooperate with the authorities. Many companies uncover information about potential bribes themselves and then report to the authorities in the hope of favourable treatment. A public company has not fought an FCPA action for more than 20 years.

Oracle is one of several technology businesses under investigation. The US authorities are also looking at allegations that Hewlett Packard executives made illegal payments to foreign state-owned and private companies.

This year IBM paid the SEC $10m to resolve civil allegations that employees paid bribes in Asia in exchange for computer gear. The company neither admitted nor denied wrongdoing.

The reported action against Oracle comes as US authorities are considering an FCPA investigation of News Corporation, owner of the now closed News of The World and one of the US's largest media firms. The authorities are investigating whether executives at the News of The World sanctioned payments to police officers to secure exclusive stories.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/31/oracle-africa-dealings-fbi-investigation
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Schoolteacher who worked as stripper uncovered by students

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Sex education teacher Benedict Garrett, who stripped under the alias Johnny Anglais, and befriended students on Facebook, told he may continue teaching

A sex education teacher who also worked as a stripper under the stage name Johnny Anglais has been found guilty of unacceptable professional conduct but permitted to continue teaching.

Benedict Garrett, 31, who was head of personal, social and health education at Beal high school in Ilford, Essex, was given a reprimand after a two-day disciplinary hearing of the General Teaching Council on Wednesday. The disciplinary committee heard that Garrett had been stripping in clubs while he was employed at the school.

The school investigated Garrett after pupils discovered a trailer for a pornographic film in which he featured.

Garrett admitted that following a school trip to Spain in February 2009, he used a pseudonym to set up a Facebook account to which students at the school were accepted as friends. The teacher regularly communicated with year 10 students about matters unrelated to school using text messages, emails and Facebook. The school's communication policy states that teachers must never befriend a student on a personal social networking site.

The disciplinary committee accepted Garrett's explanation that the Facebook account was set up in order to collect photos of a school trip to Spain, but said this did not excuse the subsequent use of Facebook to communicate with students.

Garrett argued that "a significant portion" of the public did not find his behaviour immoral or regard it as incompatible with teaching. He questioned why other behaviours which led to harm – including smoking, drinking or overeating – were tolerated by the teaching profession and said that his involvement in the porn industry was not harmful.

Derek Johns, chairman of the panel, sitting in Birmingham, told him: "The committee is content that you have sufficient insight and would not repeat this behaviour should you resume teaching.

"You have stated that you will continue to advocate the morality and acceptability of your involvement in the adult industry and argue that it should not be inappropriate for a teacher to work as a stripper or in pornographic films.

"However, the committee is content that you recognise the widely held public view that such work is not acceptable conduct for a teacher. Therefore, in relation to risk of repetition, the committee considers it is unlikely that you will seek to return to the teaching profession whilst working as a stripper or in pornographic films."

Garrett was employed at the school in Essex from 1 January 2008 to 16 July 2010, when he was suspended.

Terese Wilmot, an associate headteacher at the school, who investigated the allegations against Garrett, informed the disciplinary committee that the school had a moral and social responsibility to the local community, whose views on the question of pornography had to be respected.

Wilmot stated that the school was "very pleased" with the standard of Garrett's teaching practice when he joined. However, there were concerns about his "over-familiar" classroom manner.

At a teaching union conference this Easter teachers were warned not to accept friendship requests from pupils on Facebook amid concerns over the blurring of boundaries between school staff's professional and private lives.

In a fringe meeting at the National Union of Teachers' annual conference in Harrogate, teachers were told that pupils are getting access to potentially embarrassing information about teachers on their Facebook pages, while headteachers and school governors are increasingly using information posted on social networking sites to screen candidates for jobs.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2011/aug/31/school-teacher-stripper-facebook-pornographic
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

HP 'wants to spin off PC division'

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Head of company's Personal Systems Group says move would create '$40bn startup'

Hewlett-Packard's PC boss says that it would prefer to spin off its gigantic PC division, creating a "$40bn startup" which would be the world's biggest seller of Windows PCs in its own right.

In an announcement on the company's website, Todd Bradley, the head of the Personal Systems Group (PSG) says that doing so would be a return to the startup thinking from which HP grew. "The new organisation would be a $40bn business with the agility and freedom of a startup. That's an exciting prospect," said Bradley.

In a separate post, Bradley says that "Our preferred course to harness our vision of the future is to build a separate, more agile company. It's time to think like a startup again. It's time to be nimble and revolutionary. It's time again for world-changing innovation. And so, it's time we realised we're at a crossroads in an evolving HP."

The latest comment from the company suggests that it is moving towards pushing its PC business, which generates up to $40bn in revenues annually – but only about $2bn in profits, a 5% profit margin, far lower than any other division within HP.

In a sample advert posted on its corporate blog, HP notes that "every second, we sell two PCs somewhere in 170 countries around the globe" and that "on its own, the HP PC business is a $40bn company". It says that "our preferred course is to spin off our PC business into a separate company, creating a more agile organisation to help us better anticipate change and quickly respond to customers. This will give us the freedom to deliver the best new products at the best prices faster than we ever have before."

Bradley, a former chief executive of Palm – which HP subsequently bought after he had joined it – would be the natural chief executive for a separate PSG company.

It is not clear, however, whether PSG would also take with it the rights and intellectual property of the WebOS mobile operating system used on the now-discontinued HP TouchPad tablet and Pre smartphones. Those might enable the company to stand on its own outside of HP by giving it the ability to sell the OS or find hardware partners who wanted to build on it.

Interviewed on Bloomberg about whether he had endorsed the move to discontinue the TouchPad, Bradley said last week: "I think we lost some of the clarity around what we announced. We had around 600 engineers working to make the WebOS software compelling and we'll be in the marketplace for a long time … we have a lot of potential partners looking to work with us on it." But he said that "sales of the TouchPad were not what we had expected for various reasons … It was a prudent business decision."

HP is carrying out a review of the role of PSG inside the business, while it plans to purchase UK-based Autonomy for about $10bn. Samsung was touted as a possible buyer for PSG – which would probably attract a price tag of more than $10bn – but said on its own blog that it was not interested.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/aug/31/hp-spin-off-pc-division
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Sony tablets take on Apple's iPad

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Experts claim Sony's P and S tablets will have little impact in a market dominated by Apple

Sony unveiled its long-awaited Android tablets on Wednesday – but the price tags had analysts claiming it will struggle to compete for the No 2 spot in a market dominated by Apple.

The basic model of Sony's main tablet, shown at the IFA show in Berlin, is priced at $499 (£306), the same as the iPad – a price where Hewlett-Packard and other tablet companies have failed to dent Apple's dominance.

Sony had vowed in January that by 2012 it would become the world's No 2 tablet maker – behind Apple – and it stuck by this bold claim at IFA where its chief executive Howard Stringer introduced the devices.

"We want to prove it's not who makes it first that counts, but who makes it better," Stringer said.

Sony is late to the game, with its first tablet due to hit store shelves in September. Its release is more than 18 months after Apple released the iPad, and almost a year since Samsung came out with its first Galaxy Tab.

Both of the tablets deviate from the now-standard slimline format that has Samsung in legal trouble with Apple, where it is accused of copying elements of the iPad – leading to an injunction on the sale of its latest tablet in Germany, and potentially across Europe.

From the side, the Sony Tablet S, which has a 9.4-inch screen, resembles a cross-section of an aircraft wing. The Tablet P, which will be heavily promoted as an ebook reader as well as a web-browsing device, is a clamshell device with twin 5.5-inch screens. Both will come with Google's Android 3 "Honeycomb" tablet software: the Tablet S with 3.1 and the Tablet P to follow with Android 3.2.

Sony is trying to distinguish its Android tablets with features that let one tablet function as a universal remote, while another one folds like a clamshell.

Both tablets come integrated with Sony's music, video and ebook services, marking them out from many other Android tablets, which have struggled to integrate compelling content services in the way Apple has with iTunes music, TV, film and app stores.

Stringer, the company's Welsh-born chairman, president and chief said Sony, which owns film studios and a record company, is uniquely positioned as a producer as well as distributor of such media. "Apple makes an iPad, but does it make a movie?" he asked.

Sony's European tablet product manager, Samir Militao, said: "We think that we have a unique design. We try to differentiate our products to [various criteria] and design is one of them."

Militao said the tablets tie in with Sony's extensive range of consumer electronics. The Tablet S has infrared functionality that makes it usable as a remote control for Sony TV sets, for instance, and users can also "flick" music to DLNA-enabled hi-fi systems.

Sony has priced the devices firmly at the high end, alongside Apple. The Tablet S will go on sale in Europe from the end of September at a starting price of £479, depending on the configuration. The pocket-sized Tablet P will follow in November, starting at £599.

Sarah Rotman, at research firm Forrester, said: "Sony is no copycat … but the price raises a red flag. We've been down this road before: Motorola and HP both priced their devices on par with the iPad, and both were unable to sell their devices in volume until they lowered the price significantly."

She added: "My concern for Sony is not price competition with Apple but price competition with Amazon, whose [Android] tablet we expect to be significantly cheaper."

At least one gadget reviewer who has played with the new "Sony Tablet S" is not so sure Sony will achieve its aim of becoming the second behind Apple. "I don't think it has the premium feel, design and build quality that either the iPad 2 or [Samsung] Galaxy Tab has right now," said Tim Stevens, editor-in-chief of Engadget.

"I honestly don't think this is going to be the tablet that really catapults Sony into the lead on the Android front, which is where it needs to be if it wants to be No 2 in the tablet market."

There has been little buzz generated ahead of the release, unlike the anticipation for the iPad or even the Galaxy Tab.

Sony hopes the tablet will restore its leading position in consumer electronics. Once a symbol of Japan's high-tech might, the Japanese electronics conglomerate is struggling under the weight of its money-losing TV division and badly needs the boost of a new hit product.

"Sony really must be in the tablet market and must succeed," said Mito Securities electronics analyst, Keita Wakabayashi.

Worldwide tablet shipments are forecast to more than triple this year to 60m units, and then rise to 275.3m units by 2015, according to a report this month from research firm IHS iSuppli.

Meanwhile Dixons Store Group said that it would allow online pre-ordering of the Sony Tablet S for the next two weeks. Mark Slater, category director at Dixons Retail, said: "Sony's Tablet S is a real contender in the tablet market and one we expect to be a big success. The two week preorder period for the Sony Tablet S will be a very exciting period for us to see how popular this tablet will be with our customers."


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 01 Sep, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/31/sony-tablet-apple-ipad
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

US government 'trying to halt AT&T's T-Mobile takeover'

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Department of Justice attempting to block $39bn merger on antitrust grounds, according to reports

The US government has attempted to block the $39bn (£24bn) takeover of T-Mobile by AT&T, according to reports.

The department of justice filed court papers in Washington in an attempt to halt the merger on antitrust grounds, according to Bloomberg.

"AT&T's elimination of T-Mobile as an independent, low-priced rival would remove a significant competitive force from the market," the department of justice reportedly said in its filing.

The multibillion-dollar merger, announced in March, would be create the largest mobile provider in the US with 130 million customers, reducing the number of players in the market from four to three.

The US telecoms giant AT&T is the second largest network in the US, behind Verizon Wireless, with T-Mobile the number four network. Sprint Nextel is the other remaining large operator in the country, with the third largest service.

AT&T proposed in March to pay $25bn in cash for T-Mobile USA and the rest in stock, giving T-Mobile's German parent an 8% stake in AT&T. The agreement was approved by the boards of directors at both AT&T and Deutsche Telekom.

Regulators have pored over the terms and implications of the deal for months, given its size and scale. AT&T's shares were down 3.85% in early-morning trading on the New York stock exchange, trading at $28.53.

The DoJ had not returned requests to comment at the time of publication.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/31/us-att-t-mobile
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Spotify? There's an iPhone API for that

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Streaming music service hoping to appear inside other iOS apps

Spotify's smartphone apps have been important factors in the streaming music service's growth, not to mention its ability to convert free users into paying subscribers. Now Spotify is hoping to boost its presence on iOS with the release of its Spotify Embedded Player libspotify 9.

It's the first time Spotify has released an API for mobile developers, enabling them to integrate the service into their apps. The company has released documentation and samples to help developers to start working with the API, while also publishing a FAQ on its website.

"We hope this will enable a new category of iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch applications with Spotify inside and allow for more immersive music experiences within iOS apps," blogs Spotify's director of platform Sten Garmark.

There are, unsurprisingly, some terms and conditions. Developers must not "modify, edit, disassemble, decompile or reverse-engineer" the API, and they are not allowed to sell access to the Spotify service, or allow anyone who isn't a registered (paying) user to log in.

Developers are also barred from selling their application, charging for its use, or sell advertising, sponsorships or promotions within it. However, companies wanting to use the libspotify API commercially are invited to contact Spotify's partner team.

Spotify is not the first streaming music service to release an API for mobile developers. In the US, rival Rdio launched its Mobile Playback API in May 2011. It has since been used by apps including AOL's Play and The Grammy Awards' MusicMapper apps.

Meanwhile, music technology company The Echo Nest has released a series of APIs for mobile (and web) developers, providing easy access to music and the metadata around it. In May, The Echo Nest partnered with Rdio to make it easier for developers working with the latter's API.

The net effect of these and other APIs offered by music companies has been a thriving scene of developers mashing up different services with social and location-based features. The Music Hack Day events have been at the heart of this. Now Spotify will be able to join the fun.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/appsblog/2011/aug/31/iphone-spotify
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

London 2012 Olympics to air in 3D

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Panasonic plans to distribute more than 10 hours of 3D Games footage each day from a pool of broadcasters

London's 2012 Olympic Games will be the first to be broadcast in 3D, Olympic organisers and technology company Panasonic have announced.

At the IFA technology conference in Berlin, Olympic broadcasting services managing director Manolo Romero said the plan was to distribute more than 10 hours of 3D Games footage around the world every day. The opening and closing ceremonies will be broadcast in 3D, as will more than 12 sports, Romero said.

"Under this partnership we are assembling a pool of broadcasters that will provide this 3D coverage, the first in Olympic history, to viewers around the world," Romero said. "This is an important step in the history of broadcasting technology."

Panasonic, which has provided camera equipment for the Olympics for two decades, will supply the 3D kit for the London Games. The Japanese company is also very keen to sell the 3D television sets that are needed to view such content. Reports in the UK suggest that 3D sales accelerated relative to other high-definition sets over the summer.

"There is no doubt that the Olympic Games provides the best-ever content for the 3D market and 3D will drastically change the way we enjoy the Games in the living room," Panasonic communications chief Takumi Kajisha said at the IFA press conference. "We believe that our partnership will provide a true end to end solution for success of the first 3D live Olympic Games and create another era of Olympic broadcasting."

The BBC said on Monday that it is considering broadcasting the men's 100m final of the Olympics in 3D, but would not broadcast the whole games in the format as this would interfere with the HD quality that must be in place for the broadcasting of the whole Games.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/aug/31/london-2012-olympics-3d
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Kosovan Albanian admits killing two US airmen in Frankfurt terror attack

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Arid Uka, 21, tells court he was influenced by online Islamist propaganda before shootings at airport in March

A 21-year-old Kosovan Albanian confessed on Wednesday to killing two US airmen at Frankfurt airport, saying in emotional testimony at the opening of his trial that he had been influenced by Islamist propaganda online.

Arid Uka is charged with two counts of murder for killing Nicholas J Alden, 25, from South Carolina, and Zachary R Cuddeback, 21, from Virginia on 2 March this year. He also faces three counts of attempted murder in connection with the wounding of two others.

Although Germany has suffered scores of terrorist attacks, largely from leftwing groups such as the Red Army Faction, the airport attack was the first attributed to an Islamic extremist.

Since the September 11 2001 attacks there have been about a half-dozen other jihadist plots that were either thwarted or failed, including a plan to kill Americans at the US air force's Ramstein base in 2007.

Prosecutor Herbert Deimer told a state court in Frankfurt that Uka went to the airport with the intent "to kill an indeterminate number of American soldiers, but if possible a large number".

No pleas are entered in the German system and Uka confessed to the killings after the indictment was read, telling the court: "What I did was wrong but I cannot undo what I did."

He went on to urge other radical Muslims not to seek inspiration in his attack, urging them not to be taken in by "lying propaganda" on the internet. "To this day I try to understand what happened and why I did it ... but I don't understand."

Uka described becoming increasingly introverted in the months before the attack, staying at home and playing computer games and watching Islamist propaganda on the internet.

The night before the crime, he said he followed a link to a video posted on Facebook that purported to show American soldiers raping a teenage Muslim girl. It turned out to be a scene from Redacted, the 2007 anti-war film by Brian De Palma, taken out of context.

He said he then decided he should do anything possible to prevent more American soldiers from going to Afghanistan. "I thought what I saw in that video these people would do in Afghanistan," he told the court, his voice choking with emotion as he wiped away tears.

Uka conceded when asked by prosecutor Jochen Weingarten that the airman driving the bus had not been going to Afghanistan.

On the bus on the way to the airport to look for victims, he said he listened to Islamic music on his iPod while nursing doubts that would be able to follow through with his plan. "On the one hand I wanted to do something to help the women, and on the other hand I hoped I would not see any soldiers," he told the court.

Six months later, he says he does not understand why he went through with the killings. "If you ask me why I did this I can only say ... I don't understand anymore how I went that far."

The indictment says Uka went to the airport armed with a pistol, extra ammunition and two knives. Inside Terminal 2, he spotted two US servicemen who had just arrived and followed them to their US air force bus.

Sixteen servicemen, including the driver, were on or near the bus. Uka approached one of the men for a cigarette, prosecutors said. He confirmed they were US air force members en route to Afghanistan, then "turned around, put the magazine that had been concealed in his backpack into his pistol, and cocked the weapon", the indictment read.

He first shot unarmed Alden in the back of the head, the indictment alleged. He then boarded the vehicle shouting "Allahu Akbar" – Arabic for "God is great" – and shot and killed Cuddeback, who was the driver, before firing at others.

He wounded two others – one victim has lost sight in one eye permanently – before his gun jammed and he fled, prosecutors said. Uka was then chased and caught.

Some of the American airmen are expected to testify at the trial. At least one relative of the victims – Cuddeback's mother – has joined the trial as a co-plaintiff.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/31/kosovan-albanian-admits-killing-airmen
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Gizmodo to launch in the UK

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

UK technology news site expected this autumn in partnership between owner Gawker Media and Future Publishing

The popular US technology website Gizmodo is to launch in the UK as part of a new partnership between owner Gawker Media and Future Publishing.

The irreverent news site, which was involved in a high-profile spat with Apple last year, will unveil a UK version this autumn.

Gizmodo UK will be published by Future, alongside its existing gadget news sites, T3, TechRadar and MacFormat. The site will be edited by Kat Hannaford, a former contributing editor for Gizmodo US and new editor at T3.com.

"We are very excited about bringing Gizmodo to the UK," said Nial Ferguson, group publishing director of Future's technology division.

"It is a hugely influential brand and one that we are proud to have within our market-leading portfolio. Gizmodo UK allows us to speak to a completely new set of tech consumers and to offer our commercial partners even more exciting opportunities."

Gizmodo is one of the most popular websites in the crowded technology blogosphere. The site launched in 2002, published by British-born journalist and entrepreneur Nick Denton as part of his Gawker Media network of sites.

Gaby Darbyshire, chief operating officer of Gawker Media, said: "Future is the perfect partner to run Gizmodo in the UK. They are experts in all things tech and understand the unique voice of Gizmodo.

"We are delighted that Kat, an old Gizmodo hand, will be running the site and look forward to working with the Future team."

Last year, Gizmodo shot to international notoriety after it obtained a prototype of Apple's hotly anticipated iPhone 4. Gawker Media was cleared of all wrongdoing by California police earlier this month.

• To contact the MediaGuardian news desk email editor@mediaguardian.co.uk or phone 020 3353 3857. For all other inquiries please call the main Guardian switchboard on 020 3353 2000. If you are writing a comment for publication, please mark clearly "for publication".

• To get the latest media news to your desktop or mobile, follow MediaGuardian on Twitter and Facebook.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/aug/31/gizmodo-launch-uk
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Instagram boss on Justin Bieber, Android and why he doesn't fear Facebook filters

Thank you for using rssforward.com! This service has been made possible by all our customers. In order to provide a sustainable, best of the breed RSS to Email experience, we've chosen to keep this as a paid subscription service. If you are satisfied with your free trial, please sign-up today. Subscriptions without a plan would soon be removed. Thank you!

Eight million downloads later, Kevin Systrom still wants to make 'the social camera'

Photo-sharing startup Instagram has been on something of a hiring spree in August 2011, boosting its headcount by 50% to cope with growth that has seen its app downloaded by more than eight million iPhone owners since its launch in October 2010.

For many startups, such a recruitment drive would involve moving into bigger offices. In Instagram's case, it was more a case of finding a couple of extra chairs and desks. Yes, the most startling thing about the San Francisco-based company is that it currently only has six employees.

"We've been blown away by the response from around the world since we launched," says CEO Kevin Systrom. "We never expected to see that, and it's been really humbling. We started as just two guys in an incubator working on a project, and now we're six people, and have been handed the opportunity to do something really big in the world. We have a responsibility to see this through, and it's an amazing ride."

Instagram is far from the only mobile app offering people a way to share their photos on Twitter, Facebook, Flickr and other social services, nor is it the only one to include filters to apply visual effects to the shots before they are shared. It is certainly the one that has done most to break out beyond an early adopter audience, though.

Systrom thinks that Instagram has done a good job of providing filters for users to "modify and improve" their photos, but accepts there are many free and paid apps offering similar effects. So why did Instagram catch on?

"There's this large network underneath where people can connect and follow inspiring photographers and friends around the world," says Systrom.

"That's what a lot of other apps don't provide, but we've combined it with the effects. We tried to lower the bar for producing awesome stuff, so people can walk around with their iPhones and produce amazing pictures. The network really democratises attention: everyone from celebrities to a random guy in Japan taking pictures of his dog every day can get many thousands of followers. Taking images is the great equaliser."

The celebrities are increasing in number, including Snoop Dogg, Jamie Oliver and Justin Bieber – whose presence is often seen as the ultimate seal of pop-star approval for a buzzy social service (see also: Twitter, Tumblr). Brands have also been attracted to Instagram since its launch, with the likes of Starbucks, National Geographic, Playboy, Red Bull and Gucci all posting images on the service.

This particular group of new users poses an interesting challenge for Instagram: should it start developing some new features with celebrities and brands in mind?

In August, Fred Wilson of venture capital firm Union Square Ventures published a blog post titled "Users First, Brands Second", in which he wrote approvingly of companies including Twitter, Facebook, Foursquare and Tumblr. "The brands are all over these services now. But for the most part, these services didn't do much to bring them. The engaged users did," wrote Wilson. Instagram fits neatly into that list too.

"We want to make sure all the features we build, even when they make sense for celebrities or brands, are big-impact changes that affect everyone," says Systrom. "It's important not to get distracted. Some people have maybe over-stated the value of getting celebrities and brands from the start. If you focus on producing a great experience for anyone, that's how you get big."

Twitter famously had servers dedicated to Justin Bieber traffic when he was blowing up on that service in 2010. Has Instagram earmarked any servers for the star yet?

"Justin Bieber has certainly added to the velocity, but the press probably played it up a little bit," laughs Systrom. "We get almost one signup every second, and it's been fine: even when celebrities have signed up, we've not had any stress on the system."

With "well over eight million" downloads now, what next for Instagram? Systrom says that the biggest challenge for the company is scaling, with a lot of the work going on below the surface to ensure the service continues running smoothly as it grows. As he says, this work isn't visible to users, but if the company doesn't do it, it will be extremely visible: "The app won't work!"

Systrom outlines three other key tasks for Instagram in the coming months, starting with revamping the core camera feature. "We always wanted to be the social camera, but the photo-taking part of the app has not changed in eight to nine months," he says.

"It's way overdue for some really core improvements. The second thing is the web: we realise that people want a native Instagram experience on the web, and we need to do that sooner rather than later."

And third? Android. Systrom says that every day, Instagram gets a barrage of requests from people for an Android version of its app. The good news is that it's on the horizon.

"It's hugely important to us, but we're only six people," he says. "Android is a major priority for us, but first we have to build the team, and find the best people in the world to work on these projects." The company is currently hiring engineers and designers to help it move more quickly on all three of these aims.

There is also a fourth titbit: new filters. "We have a really big release coming out soon that really changes the way you look at filters," say Systrom, while warning that Instagram intends to continue keeping the experience simple and straightforward, rather than bombarding users with hundreds of possible visual effects.

It's impossible to describe Instagram in 2011 without referring to the 900lb gorilla looming in the distance: Facebook. The social network is expected to add Instagram-style filters to its own mobile apps in the near future, or even launch a separate photo-sharing app. Cue talk of Facebook being a potential Instagram-killer.

"I understand why someone like Facebook, where photos are core to their experience, would have things like filters," says Systrom. "But the core experience is so different. We use asymmetric follows like Twitter, which is a really big differentiating point. My friends network doesn't necessarily take the best photos. The major reason why Instagram works is that you can follow anyone out there and start following their photos immediately."

He thinks adding filters will make sense for Facebook, but maintains that this will not be direct competition for Instagram.

"It's more of a press-cycle thing: it's been sensationalised beyond the reality of what the situation is," says Systrom, while also pointing to the fact that Instagram enables photos to be shared on a range of social networks, which is unlikely to be the case for Facebook's apps.

One good omen: in 2010, the Facebook Places location feature was talked of as a potential Foursquare-killer, yet it is now being phased out by the social network in favour of wider location features, while Foursquare continues to grow. Systrom will be hoping that any threat posed by Facebook to his own company turns out to be a similarly damp squib.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds


Josh Halliday 31 Aug, 2011


--
Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/appsblog/2011/aug/31/instagram-justin-bieber-android-facebook
~
Manage subscription | Powered by rssforward.com

Share

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More